The good, the bad, and the ugly of AI and cybersecurity (PEX207)
Summary of the Video Transcription
The Current Reality of AI and Cybersecurity
Security is now considered a business enabler, not a blocker, as organizations with strong cybersecurity posture can innovate and go to market faster.
However, about 80% of companies still believe that security is their top challenge, especially when it comes to inhibitors to moving workloads to the cloud.
The average cost of a breach for highly regulated organizations is around $5 million, with the cost per exfiltrated data record being around $1 million over time.
AI-powered security solutions can identify and contain breaches up to 100 days faster than traditional methods, using AI and automation.
Common AI Security Use Cases
AI and ML are used to analyze vast amounts of data (logs, telemetry, network activity, etc.) to establish a baseline and detect anomalies as potential threats.
AI-enabled security tools can detect and respond to cyber threats with minimal to zero human interaction, learning and developing defenses autonomously.
AI can also be used to address alert fatigue by prioritizing and compressing the most critical alerts.
AI Threats and Attacks
Threat actors are also leveraging AI and ML to their advantage, using techniques like prompt injection, data poisoning, and sophisticated phishing campaigns.
AI can be used to create polymorphic malware that adapts and mutates to avoid detection.
Insider threats can be better targeted using AI analysis of publicly available data and social media profiles.
Securing AI and ML Systems
Securing AI and ML systems themselves, defending against AI-powered attacks, using AI for security operations, and leveraging Automation and decision-making are the four key pillars.
A real-world example is the "Autonomous Security and Compliance" solution, which uses AI and ML to analyze vast amounts of data and establish baselines, detect anomalies, and autonomously take remediation actions.
Challenges and Recommendations
Transparency and accountability are crucial, as many companies claim their AI systems are "black boxes" when they can, in fact, be transparent about their decision-making.
Companies should focus on building security expertise first before trying to be "first" with AI-powered solutions.
Careful scrutiny is needed when companies claim their solutions are "AI-powered" without clear use cases.
Adopting a zero-trust approach, where verification is always required, can be further enhanced by leveraging AI and its relevant data sets.
Security professionals should be aware of breach fatigue and focus on quickly mitigating the fallout from attacks.
These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact with this website and allow us to remember you. We use this information to improve and customize your browsing experience, as well as for analytics.
If you decline, your information won’t be tracked when you visit this website. A single cookie will be used in your browser to remember your preference.